Ask anyone who knows me and they’ll confirm that for at least 2 years I’ve been an advocate of principal reduction to end this economic mess.
Here’s what I don’t understand: a distressed homeowner can have a perfect payment record with their bank but be so underwater that it no longer makes sense for them to keep the property (job loss, rate reset, etc.). So they go to the bank and ask for a principal reduction. Bank says no, we’ll reduce the interest rate short term. Great, payment is lower but property is still underwater.
Bank doesn’t want to take the hit on “forgiving” a portion of the loan. So they foreclose and the house sits vacant for up to a year before it goes on the market. In the meantime, the yards have died, maintenance hasn’t been done, etc.
The bank finally sells to a new buyer for substantially less than the original owner would have taken on a principal reduction.
Makes no sense. Banks average $80,000 loss on every foreclosure. Seriously. How does not reducing the principal make sense?
OK, almost off the soapbox.
If principal reduction had been an option from the beginning, I’m guessing that at least 80% of homeowners would have stayed in their homes. Their payment would have been lower, giving them disposable income. That means more jobs. Amazing – crisis over.
After 3 years of this mess, it looks like the “experts” are finally coming around to my way of thinking. Check out this article on Principal Reduction gaining traction.
As always, I’m here for you and anyone you know that needs help with short sales, foreclosure activity, house hunting, all things real estate. 916-870-5931 or suegibsonrealtor@gmail.com