Real Estate Tips To Buying & Selling In South Jordan, Sandy, Utah

Inside Real Estate
Let Me Help You!
801-243-3020
Follow My Blog
RSS
Steve
Steve Duke
REALTOR®
    Years of Experience: 17

    Licensed CPA

Direct: 801-243-3020



Company Info


7985 S. 700 E.
Sandy, UT 84070


Real Estate Tools

Schoolsschools

Communitiescommunities

Calculatorscalculators

Archive for February 2010

Are Rent-To-Own Homes in Sandy or South Jordan A Good Idea?

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Q.    Are Rent-To-Own Homes A Good Idea?

A.    If you’re interested in owning a home, but you’re having some difficulty obtaining conventional financing, renting a home with the option to buy may be a good alternative.  In this scenario, a portion of your rent goes toward the purchase of the home.  It’s important to carefully read the contract, and consult an attorney if you have any questions or concerns before entering into a contract.

Typically, you will sign a lease with an option to purchase for an agreed price over a specific time (1-2 year lease, at which time you’ll need to obtain financing from a lender). To acquire the option, the renter/buyer pays a one time, non-refundable fee, called the option consideration (2-7% of the purchase price).  A percentage of all your rent payments should be applied toward the purchase of the home.  Rent payment must be on-time; otherwise it won’t count towards the purchase price.

You’ll be required to handle most of the home maintenance.  Make sure you have the house inspected by a professional before entering into a contract.

Is Debt Settlement Right For You?

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Is Debt Settlement Right For You?


by Michael G. Peterson

These days debt settlement is looking like an increasingly good option for many people. But before you take the plunge, there are some important things to know about how it works and how it affects your credit.

Some debt settlement companies guarantee debt relief in a year. Others promise to slash your debt, in some cases reducing the amount you owe by up to 60 percent or more, all while keeping the creditors at bay. And, almost all of them pledge to help you regain control of your finances.
If you’re drowning in debt, debt settlement programs sound like a dream come true. But, are they too good to be true? Are debt settlement companies legit, or are they a scam to be avoided at all costs? Is it smarter to tackle your debt on your own, or is it worth it to hire someone to do it for you? Before we can answer that question, let’s take a closer look at how debt settlement works.
Debt Settlement in Theory
Once you enroll in a debt settlement program, most settlement companies will tell you to stop making your monthly credit card payments and save that money. Once you’ve got a sizeable amount (usually several thousand dollars), the debt settlement company will negotiate with your credit card company, offering them a large, one-time payment to settle your debt.
Most debt settlement companies claim that this one-time payment is usually significantly less than the original amount you owed. They also tell you that they’ll put an end to the endless phone calls from creditors or collections agencies.
It’s an attractive idea. Unfortunately, most people who sign on with a debt settlement company end up deeper in debt than they were before.
Debt Settlement in Reality
Here’s what really happens if you follow the typical debt settlement plan:
The minute you stop paying your credit card bills, you’ll start to rack up high-interest, late fees and over-limit fees. Imagine that you have a $10,000 debt. If it takes you, say, three years to save enough for a settlement (which is usually about half of the amount you owe), your total debt will have doubled.
So, in the time that it takes you to save up half of your original debt – around $5,000 in this case – your debt will now be around $20,000. To settle now, you’ll need about half of that new amount – or $10,000.
See the problem?
Of course, after you stop paying your credit card bills, the calls will start coming in from creditors and collections agencies. Your phone will be ringing off the hook. But your debt settlement company handles that, right?
Wrong.
Debt settlement companies can’t stop collections calls.
The only way you can stop collections calls is by making your monthly payments. If you don’t pay, the calls will continue. If your debt is large enough, your credit card company may even take legal action to force you to pay – in many cases, your wages may be garnished until the debt is taken care of.
Even if you don’t get sued, there are still some serious drawbacks to debt settlement:

  • You’ll pay a hefty fee: Debt settlement companies usually charge a substantial fee (typically a percentage of your total debt) for their services. Ultimately, the money you pay the debt settlement company is just money you could have used to pay down your debt.
  • You’ll pay taxes: One thing that debt settlement companies don’t tell you is that you’ll have to pay income taxes if your credit company forgives some of your debt. So, if a debt settlement company gets, say, $5,000 knocked off of your total debt, you’ll pay income taxes on that money. By law, the creditor has to send a client a 1099 tax form indicating the amount written off in a settlement situation. You are responsible for taxes on that amount.
  • Your credit score will hit rock bottom: If you’re working with a debt settlement company, your credit score is probably on the low side to begin with. But, you should be aware that settling your debt will effectively ruin your credit, making it more difficult to buy a house, a car, rent an apartment, or even get a job.
  • Creditors are refusing to do business with settlement companies: Recently, more and more creditors are sending notices to their clients who have signed up with settlement companies letting them know that they will not work with these organizations.

Debt Settlement vs. Debt Management: What’s the Difference?
While a debt settlement company typically advises you to stop paying your monthly credit card bills, debt management (also known as credit counseling) takes a different approach.
When you sign up with a debt management company, your credit counselor will negotiate with your credit companies for lower monthly payments.
You send your monthly payments to your debt management company, and they distribute the payments among your credit card lenders. You make one payment a month, regardless of how many credit card bills you have.
And, credit counseling services don’t hurt your credit score – although you won’t be able to get additional unsecured credit until you complete the program.
Keep in mind that there’s typically a fee involved for debt management services, but it’s generally a lot more affordable than a debt settlement company. Credit counseling fees are typically included in the amount of your new lower monthly payment, and average around the $30 range.
Debt Management Checklist
Remember, as with anything, you need to do your homework. Debt management companies may be nonprofit, but nonprofit status is essentially a tax designation, not a government endorsement of a group’s mission. There are plenty of near-fraudulent credit counseling agencies that are registered nonprofits.
Check with the Better Business Bureau, verify the agency’s accreditation by an independent nonprofit (such as the National Institute for Financial Counseling Education), and look for positive reviews from real people. Fees for debt management companies should be reasonable–between $30 and $50 per month–and the company should give you reasonable promises (they cannot “wipe out” your debt; they can only help you pay it off).
What’s Right for Me?
Only you can decide the best way to handle your debt. Debt settlement sounds like a simple solution, but in most cases, the costs outweigh the benefits. Before you make a decision, do some research, check on the companies BBB listing, or ask friends or family members for referrals. Whatever you do, remember that if something seems too good to be true, it probably is.
Joel Walsh contributed to this article.


Michael G. Peterson co-founded American Credit Foundation, a non-profit credit counseling organization. Visit
debtguru.com for more information and financial resources.

You lost your house – but you still have to pay

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Here’s an article I’ve seen posted on a couple of different news sites that I thought I better share with my readers.

By Les Christie, staff writer CNNMoney.com February 3, 2010: 3:21 PM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — As terrible as it is to lose your house to foreclosure, at least it’s a relief to put your biggest financial headache behind you, right?

Wrong.

Former homeowners may still be on the hook if there’s a difference between what they owed on their mortgage and what the bank could sell it for at auction. And these “deficiency judgments” are ticking time bombs that can explode years after borrowers lose their homes.

It can even happen to people who got their bank to approve them selling their home for less than it is worth.

Vanessa Corey, for example, short sold her Fredericksburg, Va., home in April 2008. She and her husband built the house in 2004, but setbacks, both personal (divorce) and professional (housing bust), made it impossible for the real estate agent to keep her home. So she negotiated the short sale and thought that was the end of it.

“My understanding was that the deficiency was negotiated away,” she said. “Then, last November, I got a letter from a lawyer telling me I owed my lender $65,000. I had to declare bankruptcy. There was no way I could pay it.”
Where the foreclosure plague is spreading

Many homeowners are now in the same boat. And not just those who took out bigger loans than they could afford or who did so called “liar loans” where they didn’t have to verify their income.

Because of falling home prices, borrowers who always paid their mortgage but who have run into unforeseen circumstances — like unemployment or a job transfer — can no longer sell their homes for what they owe. As a result, they are being forced to short sell or foreclose and are getting caught up in deficiency judgments.

“After the banks foreclose, it’s very common now to have large deficiencies with houses not worth the balances owed,” said Don Lampe, a North Carolina real estate attorney.

Lenders mostly declined comment. Although Corey’s lender, BB&T did indicate it was pursuing more deficiency judgments.

“They follow the rise and fall of foreclosures,” said the spokeswoman, who would not discuss Corey’s account.
Can they come after you?

Whether banks can and will pursue deficiency judgments depends on many factors, including what state the borrower lives in and whether there’s a second mortgage or other liens. But if borrowers ignore the possibility of deficiencies, it could haunt them.

“Once they have a judgment, they can pursue you anywhere,” said Richard Zaretsky, a board-certified real estate attorney in West Palm Beach, Fla. “They can ask for financial records, have your wages garnished and, if you fail to respond, a judge can put you in jail.”

In the case of foreclosure, lenders can pursue deficiencies in more than 30 states, including Florida, New York and Texas, according to the U.S. Foreclosure Network, an organization of mortgage law firms.

Some states, such as California, are “non-recourse” and don’t allow deficiency judgments. But, even there, if the original loan was refinanced, some or all of it may be subject to claims.
Check the foreclosure rate in your state

Deficiency judgments on short sales and deeds-in-lieu can happen in many more places. In these cases, extinguishing the debt is often a matter of negotiating with the bank.

But even when lenders are willing, many borrowers may not be aware that they have to ask for release. So, if you are pursuing a short sale, be sure your attorney asks the bank to release you from any further obligation.

“People shouldn’t have a false sense of security that a deficiency judgment may not be later sought,” Zaretsky said.

He expects many will be filed over the next few years, based on the fact that banks have sold many of these accounts to collection agencies and other third parties, at discount.

“The parties who bought those notes wouldn’t have paid money for them unless they had the intention of acting,” Zaretsky said.
Ticking time bomb

What can be scary is that the judgments don’t have to be obtained immediately. Lenders or collection agencies may wait until debtors have recovered financially before they swoop in. In Florida, the bank can wait up to five years to file. Once the court grants a judgment, the lender has 20 years there to collect, with interest.

It doesn’t have to be a large amount of debt for a lender or collection agency to come after borrowers. Richard Varno and his wife short sold their Nashville home back in 2004 after he lost his job.

It wasn’t until 2008, when the second lien holder asked him for $25,000, that he realized he still was liable.

“I told them, ‘Hey, you guys released the title,’” he said. “As far as I know, I’m off the hook.”

He wasn’t. Releasing title does not necessarily end the debt. It’s complicated because of variations in state law, but, generally, a mortgage has two parts: a pledge of collateral, represented by the home, and a promise to pay off the loan.

Lenders may release property liens in order to facilitate short sales without releasing borrowers from their obligations to pay under the promissory notes. The secured debt can convert to an unsecured one after the sale.

Zaretsky had one client who was so relieved to have arranged a short sale that he signed every paper his real estate agent shoved at him, even a confession that clearly stated he still owed the debt.

“He had no idea what he was doing,” said Zaretsky. “All the lender had to do was go to court to convert the confession into a deficiency judgment.”

Lenders are also very inconsistent. One of Zaretsky’s short-sale clients was ready, willing and able to pay, but the bank did not even ask; another lender always reserves the right to pursue the deficiency.
Strategic defaults

Sometimes lenders go after borrowers walking away from their homes if they have other assets, according to Florida real estate attorney Larry Tolchinsky.

“Banks are pulling credit reports to see if it’s a strategic default,” he said. “If you’re behind on all your other payments, you’re okay. But if you’re not, they’ll come after you.”

If borrowers have any doubts about their risks, they should seek legal advice. Or, at least, call non-profit organizations such as NeighborWorks for advice. According to Doug Robinson, a NeighborWorks spokesman, its counselors always try to negotiate away deficiencies when they facilitate short sales or deeds-in-lieu.

“We don’t favor any short-sale contracts that leave any deficiency that can be pursued,” he said.

Robinson himself knows what can happen. He paid off a deficiency after his own New Jersey house went through foreclosure 11 years ago.

Proposed changes make buying a home with an FHA loan more expensive in Sandy & South Jordan

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Sandy & South Jordan first time homebuyers that want to take advantage of the current FHA guidelines need to move quickly.

As your trusted real estate consultant I wanted to let you know of some proposed changes to the FHA mortgage guidelines coming up this April 2010 and how it will effect your purchase of a home in Sandy & South Jordan

Changes that are being considered:

Down payment increase from 3.5% to 5% (could be higher)

Seller’s concession (buyer’s closing costs paid by the seller) to be no more than 3%, perhaps even lower.

Mortgage Insurance Premium which is now at 1.75% of  the loan amount could go to 3% of the loan. Premium is due at closing.

Annual Premium insurance which is currently at .55% of the loan amount and is part of the FHA monthly mortgage payment could also be going up.

Credit scores could increase to a minimum of a 620 FICO score.

If you’re a first time homebuyer who is currently looking to purchase in Sandy or South Jordan, now would be the time.

The closing costs and down payment would be what are affected the most.

Under the current guidelines a purchase scenario would look something like this:

For a home purchased at $300,000 you would need a $10,500 down payment which can be gifted, $5,066 for the up front premium insurance. You would be allowed up to 6% in a seller’s assist (buyer’s closing costs paid by the seller), in this case that would be $18,000, this would cover most of the closing costs depending on your state.

With the new proposed guidelines the scenario would look like this:

$300,000 purchase price would mean 5% down or $15,000 (there isn’t talk about changing the gift portion). The up front insurance premium due at closing would be $8,550. The seller paid closing costs would be around 3% (some would like to see this at 2%) or $9,000.

Closing costs include more than your down payment and hazard insurance; there are title fees, recording fees, attorney fees, up front real estate taxes and other miscellaneous fees. Depending on the state you reside in, the $9,000 allowed in this example would not cover most closing costs.

If you have been house hunting, and are going to be using FHA financing, this would be the time to move forward with your home purchase. Waiting could potentially mean needing thousands of dollars more in the near future to purchase a home.

If these proposed changes take effect – it’s going to be costly in the future for FHA applicants as credit scores will be have to be higher and out of pocket expenses will also be higher.

As always, keeping you updated.  If you or anyone you know is looking at purchasing a home with an FHA mortgage please let them know.  If you have additional questions please feel free to contact me.

- Copyright © 2010 Inside Real Estate, LLC

Inside Real Estate does not endorse the agents on this site, and does not guarantee the content submitted by the site's members. Blog and page entries, content, and other information contributed by agents that are members of the site are accountable to the particular agent. Inside Real Estate and Omnia Alliance LLC take no accountability for the content contributed by members to the site.