San Jose CA Homes For Sale | Buying a Home in San Jose CA | Almaden Valley Homes for Sale |Real Estate in San Jose, CA

Inside Real Estate
Hyper-Local Expert:
(408) 679-1112
Follow My Blog
johnbowman
John Bowman
Realtor

    DRE #01853768

Direct: (408) 679-1112

Office: 408-445-5102



Company Info

Coldwell Banker
1096 Blossom Hill Rd. Unit 200
San Jose, CA
408-445-5102

DRE #01853768


Real Estate Tools

Schoolsschools

Communitiescommunities

Calculatorscalculators

Mortgage Calculator

  • Price of Home ($)
  • Down Payment (%)
  • Mortgage Term (Y)
  • Interest Rate (%)
  • Monthly Payment ($)

2010 Saw Slow Recovery in Almaden, Blossom, Cambrian

If you read yesterday’s post, you know that a 10-year chart of Zillow estimates (“Zestimates) is pointing to the apparent beginning of a double-dip in home prices in Almaden and Blossom valleys, and the flattening of a yearlong up trend in Cambrian.

Nonetheless, an analysis of MSL sales statistics for the past two years shows that 2010, as a whole, was a year of recovery for all three of those markets from 2009. Without further ado, here are are the numbers based on actual closed escrows over the 2-year period:

In Almaden Valley, total sales improved from 286 in 2009 to 328 in 2010, a 14.7 percent increase; average sale price rose from $944,721 to $975,826, or 3.2 percent. On a per-square-foot basis, the gain was from $404 to $412, or 1.9 percent. And homes sold 25.5 percent quicker, in 35 days, down from an average of 47 days in 2009.

In Cambrian, total sales rose from 594 to 605, or 1.8 percent; average sale price jumped from $590,891 to $616,702, or 4.4 percent. On a per-square-foot basis, the gain was from $376 to $396, or 5.3 percent. And homes sold in 41 days instead of 50 — or 18 percent quicker.

Only Blossom Valley showed a drop in any of the four categories being reviewed: Total sales dropped from 681 in 2009 to 608 in 2010, a 10.7 percent decrease. Average sale price, however, inched up from $502,797 to $505,392, or 0.5 percent; the price gain was larger on a per-square-foot basis, from $291 to $302, or 3.7 percent. And homes sold 20.8 percent quicker, in 42 days instead of 53 days.

These statics are what they are, but they don’t exist in a vacuum. If I combine them with the Zillow estimates trend outlined in the previous post, seasonal trends, and with anecdotal evidence from the past several years, a portrait begins to appear of a market in these three areas that bottomed in early 2009 and has, essentially been bouncing along the bottom ever since.

Was there recovery in 2010? Yes, there was. But it was neither substantial nor, apparently, sustained enough to point to a market that’s headed anywhere fast.

Tags: , , , , ,

One Response to “2010 Saw Slow Recovery in Almaden, Blossom, Cambrian”

  1. Don Don says:

    John, great stat’s. Thanks for doing them, I’m going to use them for the office!

Leave a Reply

*

Corefact Widget
View Older Posts

- Copyright © 2010 Inside Real Estate, LLC

Inside Real Estate does not endorse the agents on this site, and does not guarantee the content submitted by the site's members. Blog and page entries, content, and other information contributed by agents that are members of the site are accountable to the particular agent. Inside Real Estate and Omnia Alliance LLC take no accountability for the content contributed by members to the site.