Roseville CA Homes For Sale | Buying a House in Roseville CA | Foreclosures in Roseville CA | Short Sales in Roseville CA

Inside Real Estate
Let Me Help You!
916-955-1515
Follow My Blog
Dennis
Dennis Reibold
Realtor

    GRI - Graduated Realtor Institute
    CDPE - Certified Distress Property Expert
    SRES - Seniors Real Estate Specialist
    e-PRO

Direct: 916-955-1515

Office: 916-967-2200



Company Info

Century 21
7976 California Ave.
Fair Oaks, CA
916-967-2200


Real Estate Tools

Schoolsschools

Communitiescommunities

Calculatorscalculators

 

What going to happen to Fannie, Freddie

Posted by Dennis Reibold | on Friday, February 11th, 2011 at 6:41 pm
Category: Real Estate.
Tags: , , , ,
   

Treasury eyes plan for smaller-scale Fannie, Freddie

Treasury puts forth menu of options, calls for hikes in guarantee fees

By Ronald D. Orol, MarketWatch
Last Update: 9:04 AM ET 2/11/11

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — A large portion of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should be wound down over time while the fees that the troubled mortgage refinance giants charge for guaranteeing mortgages sold to investors are increased to slowly ease the private sector back into the housing market, the Treasury Department said Friday.

The long-awaited report on the future of companies, key cogs in the nation’s housing-finance system, included both these more immediate moves as well as three options for reforming the two mega-firms.

The options preserve the ability of the Obama administration to have a behind-the-scenes dialog with congressional Republicans over the future of the nation’s still-fragile housing-finance system.

One long-term approach, backed by key GOP lawmakers, would create a virtually privatized system significantly reducing the government’s role in the mortgage market by only allowing the Federal Housing Administration and two other agencies to guarantee some mortgages for low- and moderate-income borrowers that meet creditworthiness criteria.

Another long-term approach would create a similar targeted guarantee program but also set up a catastrophic-risk insurance fund that could be put into effect in the event of massive crises.

The third would set up a similar guarantee approach, but the government would also offer reinsurance for securities of a targeted range of mortgages.

These long-term solutions would require major legislative changes — something that take years to realize — as lawmakers contemplate the their impact on a housing market that’s expected to yield another record year of foreclosures.

The Dodd-Frank act set a Jan. 31 deadline for the Treasury to release the report, which the agency missed by a couple weeks.

Changed landscape

Fannie (FNMA)  and Freddie (FMCC)  have long been crucial to the housing market, guaranteeing or owning roughly 50% of the residential mortgage market. Including Federal Housing Administration loans, the government has been responsible for about 95% of mortgage origination between 2008 and 2010, according to a Bank of America Corp. analysis.

However, in the short term, the Treasury’s seeking to have Fannie and Freddie increase the price they charge for guarantees to private-market levels. In its report, the Treasury said the goal would be to help “level the playing field” and drive investors to once again buy private-label residential mortgage-backed securities.

The Treasury also recommended that Congress should not pass new legislation continuing a provision that allows Fannie and Freddie to buy mortgages with values as high as $729,750, the level to which it was raised in 2008. Without action by Congress, the limit on loans that Fannie and Freddie can buy will drop back to a maximum of $625,500 effective Sept. 30.

Republicans support going to the lower limit, which would make it more expensive for some higher-end borrowers to obtain access to credit at the same time as it limits potential costs to taxpayers.

The Treasury’s report also recommends a gradual increase in down payments required for Fannie and Freddie to guarantee a mortgage to as high as 10% over time.

The two mortgage giants were originally set up by Congress to expand home-ownership by having Fannie and Freddie buy up mortgages from banks and other direct lenders so they would have the capital to lend more. They package them into bonds and mortgage-backed securities, some of which they keep in their portfolio and others that they sell to investors.

Fannie and Freddie charge investors a “guarantee fee” in return for backing the mortgage bonds they sell. However, the two companies became saddled with toxic mortgages and were nationalized at the peak of the financial crisis in 2008 to avoid losses and stem the credit contagion.

As of October, Fannie and Freddie have cost taxpayers roughly $151 billion in taxpayer funds, used to cover their losses, with more losses expected on the horizon.

Both Republicans and Democrats have been hesitant to move forward with legislation to reform the housing companies because of the impact any changes — or even the announcement of changes — could have on the economy recovery and the housing market.

Republicans at odds with Geithner

With the GOP back in control of the House of Representatives, lawmakers have begun to hold hearings on the subject but have yet to introduce legislation. Republicans have expressed support for some recommendations in the report, but not others.

For example, regarding the $729,750 cap, no Democratic effort to reinstate the higher purchase limit would pass because Republicans in House are not going to support such an extension, said Jaret Seiberg, analyst at MF Global Inc.

Bank of America analyst Ralph Axel contends that mortgage rates could increase — particularly for larger mortgages — if guarantee fees are hiked and the size of loans that Fannie and Freddie can buy drop to lower levels. These so-called high credit borrowers “will experience continued access to financing and get the jumbo mortgages at the higher rate, but there will be a segment of population that is borderline and once the loan limits decline, there will be some people unable to get financing,” he said.

Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R., Texas) and other Republicans want to take further steps limiting what mortgages Fannie and Freddie can buy.

Hensarling is expected shortly to again introduce a bill, “The GSE Bailout Elimination and Taxpayer Protection Act.” which would eventually wind down both Fannie and Freddie. It includes a provision that would, during the winding-down transition period, only allow Fannie and Freddie to make mortgages purchases that are at or below their local area median home price.

Hensarling’s bill, which went nowhere when the Democrats ran the House last year, would also require minimum down payments of 5% for all new loans purchased or guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie in the first year after its enactmentl. That would go up to 7.5% in the second year and 10% in the third year.

Some Republicans are also backing the Treasury’s recommendation that Fannie and Freddie should raise the fees it charges for guaranteeing credit risk. The Obama administration contends that a hike in fees charged by Fannie and Freddie would make it more expensive to buy government-backed mortgage securities and, as a result, drive investors to buy private-label residential mortgage-backed securities.

The approach is something top Republicans are backing in theory as well, including Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R., Texas), the new chairman of the oversight and investigations subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee.

On another front, Republicans are also generally opposed to the Treasury’s recommendation that Congress consider creating a catastrophic-risk insurance fund. Rep. Scott Garrett (R., N.J.) indicated that he was opposed to it, arguing that the government’s track record in pricing risk has been “extremely poor.

“The Deposit Insurance Fund, the National Flood Insurance Program, and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. are three government insurance programs that historically have terrible records of properly pricing for risk,” Garrett said.


Ronald D. Orol is a MarketWatch reporter, based in Washington.

 
 
Article Has 0 Comments | Write a Comment


Buy a Home in Roseville in 2011

Posted by Dennis Reibold | on Monday, January 10th, 2011 at 10:56 pm
Category: Homes.
Tags: , , , ,

5 Reasons to Buy a Home in 2011


Michele Lerner, author of Homebuying: Tough Times, First Time, Any Time, offers reasons why real estate is likely to improve in 2011. Here are five reasons she thinks consumers should consider a home purchase next year:

▪ Mortgage rates will stay low. Even with rates climbing — maybe to as high as 6 percent by 2012 — they are still well below where they have been historically.
▪ Tax cuts could help. Extending the tax cuts could encourage a more rapid recovery for the economy.
▪ Americans want to be home owners. A recent Fannie Mae survey showed that Americans still believe a home is a safe and desirable investment.
▪ Builders are about to begin building. Home builders have been sitting on the sidelines. This year, they think pent-up demand will create an appetite for new homes.
▪ Homes are shrinking. Homes are getting smaller, which has made them more affordable.

Source: Investopedia, Michele Lerner (12/24/2010)

Article Has 0 Comments | Write a Comment


Avoid Foreclosure

Posted by Dennis Reibold | on Monday, December 27th, 2010 at 4:29 pm
Category: Foreclosures.
Tags: , , , , , ,

Top 3 Tips to Avoid Foreclosure if You’re Struggling to Pay Mortgage As you’re heading into the holiday season, you may have found some extra time to research how you can avoid foreclosure. I applaud your taking the first and most important step in improving your situation—seeking help! Here are the top three things you should focus on when exploring foreclosure alternatives:

1.     Create a Budget: When seeking an arrangement with your lender you must prove the monthly income shortfall that keeps you from making your mortgage payments. Create an itemized list detailing your monthly income and expenses. Pull together bank statements and check stubs for the last three months.

2.     Know your Options: It’s important to know you have several options to consider so you take advantage of the solution that is best for your specific situation. Find out more about your options on my website here: www.Dennis-Sells-Homes.com

 3.     Contact an Experienced Agent: A licensed agent who has undergone specialized training is vital to successfully navigating foreclosure avoidance. I’m extensively trained to provide you with the information you’ll need to execute a strategy tailored to your situation.  

Most major lenders have granted a two-week foreclosure holiday from December 20-31. The sooner you call me, the more options you’ll have to prevent foreclosure and get back on track for a prosperous 2011!

Article Has 0 Comments | Write a Comment


Flat Prices for Roseville Homes

Posted by Dennis Reibold | on Thursday, December 23rd, 2010 at 6:17 pm
Category: Homes for Sale.
Tags: , , , ,

Roseville Home Pricing To Remain Flat in 2011

Roseville home sellers will get a break from falling home price, this coming year of 2011. Economists from CAR (California Association of Realtor) projected this earlier this year at a SAR (Sacramento Association of Realtor) monthly meeting and felt that this flat pricing will be consistent throughout Sacramento County also. See article below.

Economists Predict Flat Home Prices
Twenty-three economists surveyed this month by CNNMoney.com expect home prices to be flat in 2011. Five of the economists expect prices to fall in 2011 and then climb only 2.2 percent in 2012.

The problem is unemployment. John Ryding, chief economist of RDQ Economics, says the working-age population grew by 4 million in the last three years, adding to the depth of the problem. Most of them aren’t represented by unemployment statistics, he says, because they are working part time or have given up looking for a job.

Source: CNNMoney, Chris Isidore (12/22/2010)

Article Has 0 Comments | Write a Comment


Posted by Dennis Reibold | on Tuesday, December 7th, 2010 at 8:44 pm
Category: Foreclosures.
Tags: , , , ,

Will Roseville Foreclosures get a Break?

There are stall many homes for sale in Roseville that are facing foreclosures. To a small degree those Roseville homes that are facing foreclosure will be getting to break from the pressure of foreclosure during the holidays. See the article below.

No Foreclosures Over the Holidays

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are freezing all foreclosure evictions on the mortgage loans they own or back from Dec. 20 through Jan. 3.

“If the property is occupied, our foreclosure attorneys will suspend the eviction to provide a greater measure of certainty to families during the holidays,” says Anthony Renzi, executive vice president of single family portfolio management at Freddie Mac.

Most of the large banks, including Bank of America, J.P. Morgan Chase, and Wells Fargo, already observe a moratorium through the New Year, unless the foreclosure involves an investor who chooses not to observe the holiday policy.

Source: CNNMoney, Les Christie (12/03/2010)

Article Has 0 Comments | Write a Comment


New-Roseville Home Sales Slide

Posted by Dennis Reibold | on Saturday, December 4th, 2010 at 5:08 pm
Category: Homes.
Tags: , , , ,

Is it the time of the year or is it a market trend? Nationally new home sales are down, but Roseville homes, Roseville new homes are holding there own. Each week many of the major builders who have been ideal over the last couple years, are picking up their hammers as starting to build. 

If you would like more information on Roseville Home builders and the  models that they are building, give me a call or email me at Homes@DennisReibold.com.

Below is an article that I found interesting.

 

New-Home Sales Slide

Sales of new homes took another dip in October, sliding 8.1 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 283,000, the U.S. Department of Commerce reported last week. New-home sales are down 28.5 percent compared to October 2009.

The pace was inconsistent across the country with sales in the South rising 3.1 percent, while sales in the Northeast fell 12.1 percent. They fell 20.4 percent in the Midwest and 23.9 percent in the West.

The media sale price for a new home declined 9.4 percent to $194,000 compared to last year and was just $800 higher than it was in October 2003. The inventory of new homes for sale slid 0.5 percent to 202,000, an eight-month supply. A six-month inventory is considered good.

Source: The Wall Street Journal, Meena Thiruvengadam and Jeff Bater (11/24/2010)

Article Has 0 Comments | Write a Comment


Making Sense of Mortgage Modification

Posted by Dennis Reibold | on Monday, November 29th, 2010 at 5:09 pm
Category: Foreclosures.
Tags: , , , , , ,

Making Sense of Mortgage Modification

There has been much in the news in the past few weeks about mortgage modifications for homeowners who are having trouble making their house payments. Many are having difficulty qualifying for modifications, and so far the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) has had disappointing results.

The Washington Post recently reported that “troubled homeowners who receive housing counseling are 60% more likely to avoid foreclosure and have their mortgage payments lowered significantly than borrowers who navigate the process themselves.” I can help homeowners facilitate the process of loan modification and discuss other alternatives to foreclosure if a modification is not an option.

As a CDPE, I feel it’s my duty to help anyone I can during these hard times. If you would like to know more about mortgage modifications and whether or not you might qualify, please feel free to contact me.

Article Has 0 Comments | Write a Comment


Big Banks Fixing Foreclosure Processes

Posted by Dennis Reibold | on Monday, November 29th, 2010 at 12:18 pm
Category: Foreclosures.
Tags: , , , , , ,

Big Banks Fixing Foreclosure Processes

Bank of America and J.P. Morgan Chase told the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday that they were making changes in their foreclosure processes after reviews found areas that needed improvement.

Barbara DeSoer, president of Bank of America’s home loan business, said the company has set up a new form for creating foreclosure affidavits.These are documents that summarize the facts of a foreclosure case such as a borrower’s name and total amount owed.

Those documents, she said, “will be individually reviewed by the signer” and notarized. The company, she said is “carefully restarting” the foreclosure process.

The Congressional Oversight Panel, however, warned in a report Tuesday that the foreclosure document problems “may have concealed much deeper problems in the mortgage market that could potentially threaten financial stability.”

A Treasury spokesmen disputed that claim, saying that 11 federal agencies are investigating the issue and they don’t believe it represents a threat to the U.S. financial system.

Source: Associated Press, Alan Zibel (11/16/2010)

Article Has 0 Comments | Write a Comment


Stifting of Credit Scores

Posted by Dennis Reibold | on Sunday, November 28th, 2010 at 11:11 am
Category: Homes.
Tags: , , , ,

Are you looking to buy a home in Roseville or looking to refinance? Here is a good article about the stifting  of credit scores and how they may apply to you.

Credit Score Requirements Stifling Borrowers

Despite record-low interest rates, an increasing number of Americans can’t afford to buy a house.

The nation’s two largest mortgage lenders, Wells Fargo & Co. and Bank of America Corp., have raised the minimum required credit score on FHA-insured loans.

At Bank of America, its minimum credit scores are 620 for purchases and 640 for refinances.

Requiring a 640 credit score excludes about 15 percent of FHA borrowers, FHA commissioner David Stevens said.

Such a high limit will further delay a recovery in the real estate market, says Ron Phipps, president of the National Association of REALTORS®.

Source: Bloomberg, Jody Shenn and John Gittelsohn (11/17/2010)

Article Has 0 Comments | Write a Comment


Looking for a Jumbo Loan to buy your Roseville Home

Posted by Dennis Reibold | on Saturday, November 27th, 2010 at 10:17 am
Category: Homes for Sale.
Tags: , , , ,

Jumbo Loan are on their way Back

Many of my Roseville clients have stayed out of the real estate market because they could not find a jumbo loan to finance their home purchase. Recent trends are showing that jumbo loans are back and the upper end housing market is starting to move. If you or someone you know is looking to by or sell a home in the upper end market of Roseville and/or Granite Bay give me a call. Below is a recent article that I read that may be of interest.

Jumbo Loans Come Out of Hiding

Jumbo mortgages are more readily available than they have been for the last two years. Both small and regional banks are beginning to offer them again.

In the second quarter of this year, jumbo lending rose 30 percent compared to the first quarter, according to Inside Mortgage Finance Publication, which provides industry data.

J.P. Morgan Chase home lending unit has increased jumbo lending by 146 percent in the first six months of this year. Wells Fargo’s jumbo lending is up 47.5 percent in the same time period.

Securing these loans continues to be difficult. Borrowers need excellent credit scores, verification of income and a down payment of somewhere between 20 percent and 40 percent. Some borrowers report that approval time can be faster at smaller banks.

Source: The Wall Street Journal, M.P. McQueen (11/06/2010)

Article Has 0 Comments | Write a Comment


Market Recap

  • Avg. Sales Price: 379,000

  • Avg. Days on Market: 69

Free Market Alerts

Get local reports delivered to you

 
Ask Me a Question

Do you have questions you need Answered?

Recently Asked Questions
    Featured Listings
    » View More Listings
    market alert newsletter

    Get free market reports delivered to you. » Sign up today

    - Copyright © 2010 Inside Real Estate, LLC

    Inside Real Estate does not endorse the agents on this site, and does not guarantee the content submitted by the site's members. Blog and page entries, content, and other information contributed by agents that are members of the site are accountable to the particular agent.