First Time Homebuyer in American Fork, Forclosures in American Fork UT, Short Sales in American Fork

Inside Real Estate
Let Me Help You!
801-830-1989
Follow My Blog
RSS
bettyjomckinlay
Betty Jo McKinlay
Professional Real Estate Agent

    ABR - Accredited Buyers Representative
    PMN - Performance Management Network
    C-21 MMS - Century 21 Mature Move Specialist

Direct: 801-830-1989

Office: 801-756-9559



Company Info

Century 21 At The Rockies
792 E State Rd
American Fork, Utah
801-756-9559


Real Estate Tools

Schoolsschools

Communitiescommunities

Calculatorscalculators

 

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

National Stats

Market Trends:

  • Ave. Home Sale: $379,000

  • Ave. Days on Market: 69

Posts Tagged ‘Housing Market’

Getting Back to $5.5 Million Annual Existing-Home Sales

Monday, July 26th, 2010

Reprinted from REALTOR® Magazine [June, 2010] with permission of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®. printed in my July Newsletter, by Lawrence Yun, NAR Chief Economist:

“…There are some cautionary signs ahead. A big, albeit temporary, slump is on the way. Contract signings for May and June will be very weak. Do not be at all surprised if the pace of existing-home sales falls to 10-year lows of around 4.5 million annualized units for a couple of months before the housing market tries to get back on its own feet absent any government stimulus. If resales bounce back to a 5.5 million unit annualized pace toward year’s end then the housing market can be said to be fully back on a healthy track. It will be well short of the 7 million unit sales set in 2005, but that was an artificially fired-up figure resulting from terribly lax mortgage underwriting standards and a sizable number of speculative home purchases.

Getting back to 5.5 million annual existing-home sales will correspond to the level of home sales back in 2001. Back then, there were 130 million payroll job holders in the country. Today the worst in the job market appears to have passed. Excluding the artificial Census-related jobs, the private sector still added 495,000 in the first five months of this year and the total employment stands also at 130 million.

One big difference in the housing market now versus then is mortgage rates. The average 30-year fixed rate so far this year has averaged around 5.0 percent, compared to the average 7.0 percent rate in 2001. And while underwriting standards were not very stringent in 2001, they were not necessarily lax either. Provided that mortgage rates remain reasonable favorable for the foreseeable future – that is, remain at or under 6 percent – and if jobs continue to be added to the economy – my forecast is for 1 million new jobs in the second half of the year and another 2 million in 2011 – then home sales should easily be able to churn out a 5.5 million unit annual sales pace. Remember that total sales were 4.9 million in 2008 and 5.2 million in 2009, so settling in at 5.5 million will be a respectable improvement from the past two years.”

The fixed 30 year interest rates are holding under 5% which should help us on our way to the 5.5 million that will be a positive step in the right direction for home sales.

Info on Housing Market from American Fork, UT, Utah County

Monday, July 26th, 2010

Information from Guild Mortgage Company, Brandon Horrocks and Roger Gill, Senior Mortgage Bankers:

INFO THAT HITS US WHERE WE LIVE  Tuesday, June Housing Starts came in down 5.0% from May to a 549,000 annual rate. This was below expectations, but still up 15.1% from the low they hit in April 2009. Most of the drop came from volatile multi-family starts. Single-family starts were down a mere 0.7%. Most significantly, housing completions shot up 26.2% in June, the biggest monthly gain going back to the late 1960′s. Builders clearly shifted focus from starting to finishing, as they pushed to close sales qualifying for the homebuyer tax credit. Finally, Building Permits were UP 2.1% for June, beating expectations, so things are looking up for the months ahead.

Thursday saw June Existing Home Sales down 5.1% to an annual rate of 5.37 million. But this beat expectations for the fourth time in five months and was 9.8% above sales a year ago. The median price for an existing home also gained in June, coming in at $183,700. This is up 1.0% from last year. In addition, the FHFA price index for homes financed by conforming mortgages went up 0.5% in May, increasing for the third month in a row.

National average rates for fixed rate mortgages hit new lows, according to Freddie Mac’s weekly survey of conforming loans. So refinance applications shot up 7.6% over the week before, but best of all, purchase loan applications were also up a healthy 3.4%.

It is a great time to buy or invest in the real estate market.  Why?  the average rates for fixed rate mortgages are below 5%,  most sellers have reduced the price they want on their homes to meet current market demands and there are still plenty of short sales and bank owned properties.  Now is the time for buyers in the American Fork, Utah County housing market!

What National Stats In Home Sales Mean to the Housing Market in American Fork, Utah in Utah County

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

“Figuring out” the figures

Stabilizing home prices are encouraging. This flattening in home prices is something we’ve been seeing in all of the home price measures lately.  The tax credit has been very effective in drawing down excess inventory, with about one million additional sales resulting directly from the stimulus. The figures also point to a change in market psychology. The economy is improving; even recent jobs numbers were encouraging. That is helping to return confidence among buyers.

But there are still challenges. The housing market continues to held back from a full-fledged recovery because of mortgage issues. According to findings published in the new 2010 NAR Member Profile, one third of NAR members report that obtaining a mortgage is the most important factor limiting potential clients from purchasing a home. In addition, the REALTORS® Confidence Index (posted online on April 26 2010) reveals that 11 percent of REALTORS® had a contract canceled because an appraisal came in at less than the price negotiated between a buyer and seller. Another 16 percent report a contract had to be renegotiated because of a low appraisal. NAR leaders and staff will continue their discussions with about these other issues with government and industry leaders to insure that housing remains at the forefront of economic policy decisions.

Reprinted from REALTOR® Magazine May 2010 with permission of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®. Copyright 2010. All rights reserved.

In American Fork, we have seen a drop in listings and sales since the Federal Tax Credit ended.  The median price is American Fork for home sales dropped from $230,000 in the first quarter of 2009 to $187,000 in the first quarter of 2010.  Hopefully, the tax credit will be extended for those buyers who were under contract before April 30, 2010.  The deadline for closing was June 30, 2010; however, many short sales have not given written approval yet or it appears will not before that deadline.   The extension of this deadline will be helpful for those buyers in that situation.

Housing Market Looking Good with Caution of Greece and Oil Spill

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

According to Lawrence Yun, NAR Chief Economist, in his article “The Good News – Tempered by Greece and Oil, we have a positive outlook for the housing market unless troubled by the country, Greece, and the oil spill in the Gulf.

Read the following by Yun:

“Now that the housing market is truly on its own, what can we expect? In the immediate months following the tax credit expiration date, home sales will slide measurably lower. By autumn of 2010, it will be up to job creation and consumer confidence to do the trick in supporting the housing market. Another potentially big demand source is that from improving funding for jumbo and second-home mortgages. These segments of the housing market were essentially shut down last year because these mortgages did not have government backing and the banks were scrambling to boost their capital to be well beyond the ‘stress-test’ levels. As a result we saw much bigger swings in the second-home market. Second home sales in 2009, for example, were down 55 percent from their peak level in 2005. Primary home sales, meanwhile, declined by “only” 23 percent over the same period. The good news is that in the recent past months steadily improving signs of increased lending for jumbo and second-home mortgages have been appearing. That is not surprising given the huge profits and much improved capital situation in the banking sector. Banks are steadily moving towards more normal lending activity even to the sectors that do not have government backing. Therefore, there could be a nice swing back of high-end jumbo home sales and vacation home sales this year. ”

We will need to watch the Greece crisis as it affects many other countries and eventually the USA per bail out money and the containment of the oil spill in the Gulf as it will affect our country’s economy.

Will More Jobs Help the Housing Market Rebound?

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

A statistic given by RISMEDIA was that new homes sales increased 26.9% in March.  Many speculate that the federal tax incentives were the impetus.  However, there are those who think that job creation is essential for the housing momentum to be sustained.

The following was reported in RISMEDIA, Posted By susanne On April 27, 2010.

“It shows that the tax credit still has some punch, and we will probably see some better sales numbers for April,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody’s Economy.com. (more…)

Drop in Sales from Jan 2009, but Prices Steady or Slightly Higher

Monday, April 19th, 2010

From my April newsletter:

Existing-home sales fell in January but are above year-ago levels, according to the National Association of Realtors®.

Existing-home sales – including single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops – dropped 7.2 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.05 million units in January from a revised 5.44 million in December, but remains 11.5 percent above the 4.53 million-unit level in January 2009.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said there is still some delay between shopping and closing that affected current sales. “Most of the completed deals in January were based on contracts in November and December. People who got into the market after the home buyer tax credit was extended in November have only recently started to offer contracts, so it will take a couple months to close those sales,” he said. “Still, the latest monthly sales decline is not encouraging, and raises concern about the strength of a recovery.”

Total housing inventory at the end of January fell 0.5 percent to 3.27 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 7.8-month supply at the current sales pace, up from a 7.2-month supply in December. Raw unsold inventory is 9.6 percent below a year ago, and is at the lowest level since March 2006.

“Activity should be picking up strongly in late spring as buyers take advantage of the tax credit, which is critical to absorb distressed properties reaching the market and to continually chip away at inventory,” Yun said. “With a downtrend in the number of homes on the market, especially in the lower price ranges, values are beginning to firm but with great variance around the country.”

The national median existing-home price for all housing types was $164,700 in January, unchanged from a year earlier. Distressed homes, which accounted for 38 percent of sales last month, continue to downwardly distort the median price because they typically are discounted in comparison with traditional homes in the same area.

A parallel NAR practitioner survey shows first-time buyers purchased 40 percent of homes in January, down from 43 percent in December. Investors accounted for 17 percent of transactions in January, up from 15 percent in December; the remaining sales were to repeat buyers. The survey also shows that buyer traffic increased 9.4 percent in January.

NAR President Vicki Cox Golder, owner of Vicki L. Cox & Associates in Tucson, Ariz., said buying a home in the current environment has become more challenging. “First-time buyers and others who need a mortgage are increasingly losing out to all-cash investors for the best bargains in many areas, particularly for foreclosed homes where cash is king,” she said.

“Inventory conditions vary by price range, and of course there are major differences depending on location. Realtors® are the best buyer resource for strategies on winning bids in increasingly competitive markets,” Golder said. “The bidding for more desirable homes will only accelerate between now and the April 30 contract deadline to qualify for a tax credit of up to $8,000.”

According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage edged up to 5.03 percent in January from 4.93 percent in December; the rate was 5.05 percent in January 2009.

Single-family home sales fell 6.9 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.43 million in January from a level of 4.76 million in December, but are 8.6 percent above the 4.08 million pace in January 2009. The median existing single-family home price was $163,600 in January, down 0.4 percent from a year ago.

Existing condominium and co-op sales dropped 8.1 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 620,000 in January from 675,000 in December, but are 38.1 percent above the 449,000-unit level a year ago. The median existing condo price was $172,400 in January, which is 1.4 percent higher than January 2009.

Regionally, existing-home sales in the Northeast fell 10.9 percent to an annual pace of 820,000 in January but are 22.4 percent above a year ago. The median price in the Northeast was $245,300, a gain of 8.8 percent from January 2009.

Existing-home sales in the Midwest declined 6.9 percent in January to a level of 1.08 million but are 8.0 percent higher than January 2009. The median price in the Midwest was $130,300, which is 1.0 percent below a year ago.

In the South, existing-home sales dropped 7.4 percent to an annual pace of 1.87 million in January but are 12.0 percent above a year ago. The median price in the South was $140,200, down 2.0 percent from January 2009.

Existing-home sales in the West declined 5.2 percent to an annual rate of 1.28 million in January but are 7.6 percent higher than January 2009. The median price in the West was $203,400, down 5.8 percent from a year ago.

The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing 1.2 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.

Reprinted from REALTOR® Magazine January 2009 with permission of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®. Copyright 2009. All rights reserved.

Overview of Housing Market January

Monday, March 8th, 2010

This article appears in my March, 2010 Newsletter:  “Existing-home sales fell in January but are above year-ago levels, according to the National Association of REALTORS®.

Existing-home sales – including single-family, townhomes, condominiums, and co-ops – dropped 7.2 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.05 million units in January from a revised 5.44 million in December, but remain 11.5 percent above the 4.53 million-unit level in January 2009.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said there is still some delay between shopping and closing that affected current sales. “Most of the completed deals in January were based on contracts in November and December. People who got into the market after the home buyer tax credit was extended in November have only recently started to offer contracts, so it will take a couple months to close those sales,” he said. “Still, the latest monthly sales decline is not encouraging, and raises concern about the strength of a recovery.”

Inventory Levels

Total housing inventory at the end of January fell 0.5 percent to 3.27 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 7.8-month supply at the current sales pace, up from a 7.2-month supply in December. Raw unsold inventory is 9.6 percent below a year ago, and is at the lowest level since March 2006.

“Activity should be picking up strongly in late spring as buyers take advantage of the tax credit, which is critical to absorb distressed properties reaching the market and to continually chip away at inventory,” Yun said. “With a downtrend in the number of homes on the market, especially in the lower price ranges, values are beginning to firm but with great variance around the country.”

Median Home Prices

The national median existing-home price for all housing types was $164,700 in January, unchanged from a year earlier. Distressed homes, which accounted for 38 percent of sales last month, continue to downwardly distort the median price because they typically are discounted in comparison with traditional homes in the same area.

A parallel NAR practitioner survey shows first-time buyers purchased 40 percent of homes in January, down from 43 percent in December. Investors accounted for 17 percent of transactions in January, up from 15 percent in December; the remaining sales were to repeat buyers. The survey also shows that buyer traffic increased 9.4 percent in January.

NAR President Vicki Cox Golder said buying a home in the current environment has become more challenging. “First-time buyers and others who need a mortgage are increasingly losing out to all-cash investors for the best bargains in many areas, particularly for foreclosed homes where cash is king,” she said.

“Inventory conditions vary by price range, and of course there are major differences depending on location. REALTORS® are the best buyer resource for strategies on winning bids in increasingly competitive markets,” Golder said. “The bidding for more desirable homes will only accelerate between now and the April 30 contract deadline to qualify for a tax credit of up to $8,000.”

According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage edged up to 5.03 percent in January from 4.93 percent in December; the rate was 5.05 percent in January 2009.”

Energy Costs in Residential Living

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Power Savers – Energy Efficiency in the Residential Sector

Reprinted from REALTOR® Magazine January 2010 with permission of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®. Copyright 2010. All rights reserved.  from my February Newsletter:

According to the U.S. Department of Energy’s 2008 Annual Energy Review, the residential real estate sector accounts for roughly a fifth (22 percent) of all energy consumption in the country. This considerable share of all energy consumption has led lawmakers to propose policies to improve energy efficiency in homes. At the same time, homeowners and home buyers are showing a greater preference towards energy efficiency for reasons varying from a desire to become more environmentally conscientious to cutting down on their monthly energy bills. When formulating policy, however, there are several factors to consider.

Older vs. Newer Homes

Older homes consume more energy than newer homes. According to the Department of Energy’s 2005 Residential Energy Consumption Survey, homes constructed before 1970 consume roughly one and a half times what newer homes consume, on a per square foot basis. It should be noted that the average size of homes has been steadily increasing since the 1970s, though older homes still in existence tend to of similar size compared to recently built homes. However, recently there has been a decline in the median size of homes. This is likely due to the slowing of the housing market over the past couple of years as well as rising energy costs.

Also, according to the 2007 American Housing Survey, older homeowners tend to occupy a larger share of older homes. This is an important point as it may have ramifications in terms of public policy. Government restrictions or mandates that require energy audits or upgrades may place an excessive burden on older home owners who often are retirees with less flexible incomes or restricted in their geographic mobility.

Cost Variations

Regionally, great variations persist in terms of energy consumption and costs. Some of this is attributable to climate variation throughout the country. The Pacific and South Atlantic regions are generally warmer in the winter; in the case of the Pacific the weather is also milder in the summer than in areas like New England or the Middle Atlantic. This variation in climate means that certain regions have lower demand for heating or cooling.

Consequently, energy costs for the typical household can vary widely, according to the DOE’s 2005 Residential Energy Consumption Survey. In the Northeast, the typical yearly energy bill was $2,319, compared to $1,491 in the West. Federal legislation regarding residential energy policy should take into account these regional variations when it comes to energy costs.

Similarly, energy consumption varies by state. For instance, the typical yearly energy bill for a home in New York was $2,409 while in California the typical bill was $1,396. A major reason for the difference is heating costs, which account for almost two–fifths of energy bills in the Northeast and Midwest, compared to approximately one–fifth in the South and the West

Ninety Day Wait No Longer Necessary for Resale of HUD Foreclosed Properties

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

There is good news for many a buyer!  RISMEDIA sums it up in their article by Suzanne, January 18, 2010: <!– /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:”"; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} p {mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} –>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:”";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
“RISMEDIA, January 19, 2010—In an effort to stabilize home values and improve conditions in communities where foreclosure activity is high, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan recently announced (more…)

Extending the Good News for Home Buyers

Monday, January 18th, 2010

Extending the Good News for Home Buyers in American Fork, UT, Utah County

by Lawrence Yun, Chief Economist, NAR Research  (the following article is taken from my January Newsletter)

Let’s first turn to the terrific news regarding the housing stimulus. Earlier this month, the U.S. Congress overwhelmingly passed and the President signed into law new measures to maintain the momentum for a housing market recovery. The home buyer tax credit, originally scheduled to expire at the end of November will now be available through the middle of next year and more potential buyers will be able to take advantage of it. The income limit was also increased and many move-up buyers – not just first-timer purchasers – also will qualify. Furthermore, loan limits will not shrink as was planned for next year; in high-cost areas, the loan limit will remain at near $730,000 in 2010, thereby permitting more consumers to tap into the historically low mortgage rates.

As most of us are aware, the housing market recovery to date has been concentrated in the lower-end starter home segment. While the mid-priced market has begun to show signs of life, it is still far below normal activity. The upper-end remains sluggish. Therefore, enlarging the tax credit to include move-up
buyers will add the necessary “juice” to broaden the recovery. The accompanying increased velocity in home sales will mean more economic activity. Also, even though there may be less impact in the overall net inventory (a person sells before buying so it looks as a “wash” on inventory), the months’ supply will fall because of rising sales. Increased sales have the added benefit of making HVCC and appraisal issues less problematic since more comparables will be available.

Adding it all up, home sales are now expected to get a boost by roughly 15 percent next year. Existing-home sales are forecast to post 5.7 million units in 2010 (up from 5 million units in 2009). New home sales will also rise, reaching 550,000 (from 400,000). More importantly, inventory will likely fall to a 6-7 months’ supply by the middle of next year. That draw down of inventory means that that there are likely to be modest home price gains. Roughly speaking a 2-5 percent price gain is likely in many parts of the country in the next year.

Rising home values will prevent home prices from over correcting even further. Home prices have, indeed, been over correcting and have led to sizable destruction in middle-class housing-related wealth. By contrast, stock market and financial wealth have experienced spectacular gains in the past nine months. Despite those gains, however, consumer confidence still continues to tread near historic lows.

Why is there a disconnect between the rising stock market and low consumer confidence? Most middle-class families have the majority of their wealth tied to housing and less to the stock market. So as long as home values fall, then consumer confidence and the broader economy will face challenges. Therefore, housing-focused stimulus measures will help households build up their housing-wealth (again) and lay the foundation for a sustainable economic recovery.

There were those who argued against the home buyer tax credit. They contended that it would be cheaper for the government just to let home values slide by $8,000 (the amount of the credit) because from a buyer’s point of view, there is no difference between a $8,000 credit or an equal amount decline in home value. However, a further decline in home value by that amount would have translated into a $700 billion wealth destruction for middle-class home-owning families. Such an unnecessary loss of household wealth would hold back general consumer spending and thereby hinder a broader economic recovery. But with the tax credit extended and expanded, rising home sales will help nudge home values upward rather than continuing to overcorrect. Yes, the tax credit extension will have an impact on the federal budget deficit – around $10 billion. But those monies will be easily recovered as the economy gets a boost in addition to preserving the middle-class wealth.

The commercial real estate market will also benefit, though as always after some lag time. As the economy becomes more fully entrenched in “recovery” mode, employment will start to turn around. Rising employment and recovering consumer wealth will mean an eventual increase in demand for office, retail, and industrial space.

As always, there are some caveats. Despite the very positive news on the housing stimulus, there remain significant risks to the forecast. Mortgage rates will rise from their rock-bottom points as we move into the next year. The Federal Reserve will slowly start the unwinding of its mortgage-backed security purchases. Also, consumer prices will be watched for any sign of accelerating inflation. Bond investors, therefore, will be cautious about lending at such a low rates. The 30-year fixed rate is likely to reach 5.7 percent by the end of 2010 from the current 5.0 percent.

The labor market is another worry. Though anticipated, the rising unemployment rate is a painful reminder that not all is well. The unemployment rate in October zoomed into double digits – 10.2 percent, its highest level since 1983. And the climb is not over yet – look for unemployment to hit 10.4 percent before reversing. With 7 million job cuts in the past two years, the current total payroll employment at 130.8 million is even below the total jobs that existed in 2000. The country has about 25 million more people in 2009 compared to 2000, yet the total number of jobs has remained unchanged. The silver lining is that the pace of job cuts is now less sharp now than in the first half of the year. Still, the jobless rate unfortunately will remain stubbornly high for quite some time. While job creation is expected to turn positive by spring, unemployment will likely be at 9.5 percent by November 2010 at the time of the mid-term elections. A more-than-usual number of elected officials will be voted out.

Despite the risks of rising mortgage rates and rising unemployment, the housing outlook has significantly improved. As the fear of falling home values disappears, that one key negative factor that has held back home sales will no longer be in play. Happier days are ahead

Reprinted from REALTOR® Magazine December, 2009 with permission of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®. Copyright 2009. All rights reserved

Market Recap

  • Avg. Sales Price: 379,000

  • Avg. Days on Market: 69

Free Market Alerts

Get local reports delivered to you

 
Recently Asked Questions
    market alert newsletter

    Get free market reports delivered to you. » Sign up today

    - Copyright © 2010 Inside Real Estate, LLC

    Inside Real Estate does not endorse the agents on this site, and does not guarantee the content submitted by the site's members. Blog and page entries, content, and other information contributed by agents that are members of the site are accountable to the particular agent. Inside Real Estate and Omnia Alliance LLC take no accountability for the content contributed by members to the site.